|
First Impressions: Suspending Judgment for
Smarter Hiring
by Laura Gassner Otting,
President, Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group
(This article is reprinted with the permission of
www.ExecSearches.com, for whom it was
originally written.)
You never get a
second chance to make a good first impression. We’ve all had the mantra drilled
into our heads by bosses, parents, teachers and colleagues. As interviewees, we
whispered it to ourselves in preparation. I’ve even had a search committee
member or six or seven repeat it to me as an excuse to rule out a potential
candidate that just didn’t strike their fancy.
First impressions
tell us things like preparation, confidence, comfort level and even grooming
habits; some of these are important, but none are quite central to determining
whether a candidate will successfully perform the tasks and duties we expect
from the hire. The most difficult task of the interviewer is to avoid making
and solidifying a first impression.
Suspend Judgment for as Long as You Can
Most interviews are
scheduled to last for an hour or more, yet the vast majority of interviewers
admit to making an impression within ten minutes of the candidate walking
through the door. These interviewers immediately fall into a pattern that
shifts the balance of the conversation in ways that confirm the first
impression, whether or not it was correct.
For example, an
interviewer who makes the first impression, “I like this person; s/he could work
out quite nicely,” starts chatting conversationally, asking softball questions,
and worse, allows the candidate to pontificate on what they would, should, or
could do if hired. The interviewer or interview committee spends more time
talking than listening, and most of that talking is done in an effort to sell
the candidate on the job, not screen his or her qualifications. The “yes”
interview leaves the hiring manager or interviewing panel with a nice feeling
about the candidate, and high hopes for the future, but no real understanding of
what skills, knowledge and abilities that candidate is bringing to the job.
Worse yet, an
interviewer who immediately thinks, “No way; I can’t imagine s/he here,” does
the opposite, spending the rest of their time disengaged, or worse, tearing the
candidate apart through tough questions with even tougher answers.
Remember that it
takes at least ten minutes for a candidate to get past his/her nervousness, or
for the interviewer or interviewing committee to establish a flow of
conversation. Until then, you cannot truly get into the nitty gritty of what
the candidate brings to the table.
Past Performance is Key
Past performance is
the single greatest predictor of future performance. Talk is cheap, and pinning
your hopes and dreams on the fact that a candidate who looks great on paper will
finally end your search is silly. As a lifetime Red Sox fan, I can attest to
that.
Most search
committees make the mistake of asking questions based on the answers they expect
to get, not the other way around. Good interview questions start with a good
job description, one that outlines what the successful candidate is expected to
accomplish on the job. Create a pre-determined list of questions based not on
the resume of the candidate to be interviewed, but on the qualifications and
track record a candidate must bring to the table in order to be successful in
the position.
Determining Your Fallibility
Consider your
decision making style: do you instinctively react with your gut, or do you take
longer to come to a decision? The odds are that your interviewing style mirrors
your decision making style. The more of an emotional decision maker you are,
the harder you’ll have to work to control your impulse to react to first
impression triggers.
An interview should
examine professional experience, i.e., a track record of on the job performance,
as well as the personal characteristics of honesty, integrity, determination,
humor and general likeability. On the job performance comes through only if you
get past the first impression. Personality and character are difficult to
measure, and certainly hard to pinpoint in an interview; try to rely more on
reference checks for this information than the interview personality your
candidate brings to your first meeting.
|
Holding judgment in an interview is an
extremely difficult task. The following tips will increase your ability to
wade past potentially incorrect first impressions and learn more about the
candidate’s track record:
-
Screen all candidates with a telephone
interview, thereby forcing you to delay the effects of any visual first
impressions.
-
Begin the interview by chatting casually; it
will ease all parties.
-
Remain quiet for a few beats after the
interviewee has stopped talking.
-
Interview as a committee to reduce personal
dynamics.
-
Bring a list of interview questions based on
the performance indicators in the job description.
-
Note the halfway mark of your scheduled
time; reevaluate your impressions.
-
Assign members of the interview committee to
cover different areas of the candidate’s background.
-
Avoid questions that start with “What would
you do if…”.
-
Throw some hardball questions at likeable
candidates, and softer ones at the candidates you don’t like; their
interview performance may be based on yours.
-
Talk less than you listen.
|
Laura Gassner Otting is founder and president of
Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group, a niche consulting firm dedicated to
strengthening the capacity of nonprofits and their staff,
and specializes in
helping nonprofit organizations nationwide with their hiring processes.
Increasing the
capacity of nonprofits and their staff.
|