|
Taming the Paper Tiger: Sorting
Resumes and Prioritizing Candidates
by Laura Gassner Otting,
President, Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group
(This article was originally published by
www.NonprofitOyster.com,
as part of their NonprofitOyster Pearls series.)
Volume 1 /
Issue 4 / September 10, 2003
First, Set Up a System
Sorting Resumes Winnows the Pile
Prioritize Candidates with an "A" List and a "B" List
Use a Rolling Admissions Process
Taming the Paper Tiger: Sorting Resumes and Prioritizing Candidates
Most
hiring managers follow a similar rollercoaster of emotions at the beginning of
any search. First, there is a quiet nervousness that no good candidates will
respond to a major expenditure of advertising dollars. Next, feelings of delight
and elation as the first few resumes begin to fall in their inboxes. Then,
confused fear as the piles of mail, faxes, e-mails and calls keep coming, piling
up and up and up. Finally, the lucky ones find relief as they tame the paper
tiger and sort through to find those candidates worthy not only of an interview,
but possibly even an offer letter.
First, Set Up a System
Even before you place your first advertisement, you need to set up a system that
can handle the responses without overtaxing your probably already overburdened
staff. Responding to all inquiries reflects well on your organization; not
responding eventually gets back to donors and other opinion makers. Having a
system in place early will alleviate the strain of back pedaling to rush out
late responses, whether or not you are interested in the candidate. Not much
looks worse than a letter five months post application telling a candidate that
you aren't interested. Consider using one of the following two form letters for
post or electronic delivery:
Thank you for applying:
"Thank you for responding to our advertisement for the position of _________. We
are pleased with your interest in this opportunity to join [our organization]
and look forward to reviewing your credentials.
A thorough search and serious candidate review takes time; we appreciate your
patience. Once we have reviewed your materials, we will contact you as we need
more information."
Thank you for applying but we are not interested:
"Thank you for responding to our advertisement for the position of _________. We
have had tremendous response to our initial outreach efforts and are now working
to review the many applications we have received.
I regret to inform you that your background, while impressive, does not fit with
our needs at this time. However, other opportunities often arise at [our
organization] and we will keep your materials on file should anything else seem
appropriate for your background."
Sorting Resumes Winnows the Pile
The vast number of responses to any job opening are bound to be unqualified;
some seem not to have even read the position description but just apply with an
"insert job here" mentality. That doesn't change the fact that you still have to
sort through every resume that comes across your desk, e-mail or fax.
According to Alison Raby, president of Berkeley, California-based
Mariposa
Search, "You have to give everyone their due and look at every resume that comes
through the door in order to avoid being unfair or prejudiced in any way." It's
a daunting task, to be certain, but like many experienced recruiters, Raby
approaches it logically to winnow the pile of resumes down to a manageable,
interesting and qualified few.
Raby explains, "I ask myself 'What is the one sentence that really describes
what my client wants?' and then I take that baseline, those keywords, and match
them to the words on the resumes." Each position in each organization is unique;
some organizations are looking first for degrees, others weigh exposure to a
certain mission or population more heavily, and yet others highly value
experience managing budgets or staffs of a certain size.
Raby continues, "Once you sort the pile of resumes from 100 or more down to 30
or less, then you can sort by other, more nuanced factors, adding depth to the
general questions of budgets or missions by learning more about the context in
which the work occurred." For example, if a development director raised $2
million, examine whether the money was raised from direct mail, foundations,
grants, or major gifts. If your organization wants to diversify its funding
base, make sure that the money raised came from sources you haven't already
secured; if the majority of your funding comes from the types of sources in
which this candidate is expert, the ability to raise $2 million is far less
relevant to your organization.
Prioritize Candidates with an "A" List and a "B" List
Cutting applicants loose is difficult when they fall into a grey area of "not
perfect, but not wrong." As a result, beleaguered hiring managers find
themselves with too large of a list of the "call" resumes and not enough of the
other, far less labor intensive "do not call" variety. To remedy this situation,
staffing professionals like Lisa Brown Morton, President and CEO of
Nonprofit HR
Solutions in Washington, D.C., divide all applicants into an "A" and "B" list
and contact the top four to six "A" candidates first. Solutions like this one
help the hiring manager avoid wasting valuable time with candidates who are less
than perfect for the open position.
The division of resumes for Morton follows another seasoned approach.
"Typically, we are looking for connections to our existing needs such as
position-specific experience comparable with the needs of the vacancy and
experience with the nonprofit sector. If hiring for mid-level manager position,
resumes from director and vice-president level candidates are screened out. We
also look at resumes that are well-formatted and free of typographical errors.
Lengthy cover letters are also a distraction. If a candidate can't articulate
how their experience matches with the requirements of the position in two
paragraphs or less, we often move to the next one."
Use a Rolling Admissions Process
Resumes will trickle in for months. Do not wait for critical mass to begin
calling, should you find an "A" list candidate among the early responses. As
long as you feel you have enough candidates to make strong comparisons, get on
the phone and start dialing. A good candidate is a good candidate, and likely
will be applying for more than one job. Standing on ceremony, or getting trapped
in the bureaucracy of a sorting system, will put you at risk of losing that "A"
lister to another search.
FIVE
PEARLS OF WISDOM:
From 100 Candidates to 10 Finalists
Avoid
getting buried in paper. Use these five shortcuts and their questions to reduce
the resumes in your inbox to a manageable number:
- Look at the Current Job: Does the candidate work in a similarly
complex organization or mission area or have a title connoting
parallel or like responsibilities? Have they been in their current
job for a decent amount of time?
- Determine the Degrees: Do the dates and levels of degrees lead
you to believe the candidate has the right amount and focus of
experience or training? Has there been the necessary or appropriate
ongoing training or education?
- Scan for Numbers: Do the budgets or staff sizes managed prepare
the candidate for success in an organization of your size? Do the
amounts of money raised match your needs? Does the size of the
program or grant portfolio enable them to make the leap to your
program or grant portfolio?
- Examine Tenures and Job Switching: Has the candidate worked in
one organization his/her whole career? Has s/he not stayed with an
organization long enough to bring about change? Is the movement
endemic to the field or abnormal and questionable?
- Search for Keywords: What are the five "must-haves" for this
candidate to succeed in the job? Do those words key to your job
description match the words in the candidate's resume?
Laura Gassner Otting is founder and president of
Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group, a niche consulting firm dedicated to
strengthening the capacity of nonprofits and their
staff, and
specializes in helping
nonprofit organizations nationwide with their hiring processes.
Increasing the
capacity of nonprofits and their staff.

|