|
An Overview of the Search
Process - Getting from Vacancy to Hire
by Laura Gassner
Otting, President, Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group
(This article was originally published by
www.NonprofitOyster.com,
as part of their NonprofitOyster Pearls series.)
Volume 1 /
Issue 2 / May 14, 2003
Evaluating the New Terrain
Writing a Job Description
Effective Advertising
Receiving and Sorting Through
Resumes
Looking Beyond the Active Job
Seeker
Determining a Pool of Candidates
Running a Successful
Interview Session
Reference Checks
Negotiation
Fresh Eyes
An Expanded Candidate Pool
A Specialization
Providing a Buffer
Deeper Knowledge About Candidates
A
Guarantee
An Overview of the Search Process - Getting from Vacancy to Hire
Bad hires are
expensive. They weaken morale, devastate momentum, and cost already
cash-strapped nonprofits badly needed funds. In fact, studies have
shown that a bad hire can end up costing a nonprofit more in the end
than paying for professional help at the beginning of a search. Some
nonprofits wouldn't dream of doing a search without professional
help; however, some nonprofits can't afford it or don't need it.
According to Boston-based executive search consultant for nonprofits
Susan Egmont of
Egmont
Associates, "A full search is a time-intensive process and often
the hire is the most important decision the organization will make
in the near future." Determining whether an organization ought to do
a search in house, or hire a search firm for assistance, however, is
a matter of understanding the entire search process and evaluating
capacity to absorb the hours and energy involved. Egmont cautions
nonprofit managers to consider the following questions: "If you knew
it might take 200 hours of your time, would you volunteer to direct
the search while you continue to meet current demands? How prepared
do you feel to take on the many complex and dynamic issues of a
search at once?"
A search may take anywhere from three to five months – Egmont's 200
hours are standard across the executive recruiting world – depending
on the seniority, complexity and situation of the position and
nonprofit. Integral to any search are the following steps:
Evaluating the New Terrain:
From the moment an employee announces his/her resignation or is fired,
nonprofits should examine the role they filled, the staff around
them and the direction of the organization. A search is an ideal
opportunity to redirect projects, refocus stakeholders and
reevaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a staff. Often, that
macro-view has already been taken when a new position is created.
Writing a Job Description:
From the determination of direction, focus and staff strength, the
nonprofit will need to write a position description. These documents
serve as a marketing tool for the organization, enticing passive job
seekers and allowing active ones to determine their fit.
Effective Advertising:
Once a position has been defined and described, you need to distribute
the job opening far and wide, but in a way that casts the net in a
strategic and cost-effective way.
Receiving and
Sorting Through Resumes: Expect that you will receive
100-200 or more resumes for any opening posted. Be prepared to sort
through each of the resumes, cover letters and additional materials,
and be prepared to acknowledge their receipt.
Looking Beyond
the Active Job Seeker: Push, prod, cajole, harangue your
board, staff, funders, community members, competition, colleagues in
like organizations and other stakeholders into producing names of
potential candidates. Often the best job seeker is the passive one,
the one you will have to convince to apply. You'll need to work
extra hard to locate and secure these candidates, but your search
will be the richer for them.
Determining a Pool of
Candidates: Once you've whittled the enormous pile of
paperwork down to 15-20 reasonably qualified, interested candidates,
expect to spend upwards of a week or two just interviewing potential
candidates by telephone. From there, you'll need to make decisions
about who to bring in front of a search committee or hiring manager.
If you run a series of face-to-face interviews before candidates
meet with a search committee or hiring manager, expect to spend at
least another week on organizing the logistics, holding the
interviews and doing the appropriate follow-up.
Running a
Successful Interview Session: Spend extra time ensuring
that search committee members or hiring managers understand the
goals from the interviews and are ready to present a uniform and
enticing face of the organization. Candidates heavily appraise
organizations based on this sole interaction, and expect you to be
at your best as well. If you appear to be fumbling, disorganized,
out of step with each other, or worse, allow them to run into other
candidates in the hallway, you stand no chance of a successful hire.
Reference Checks:
Reference checks are among the most important work of a search.
Thorough referencing – which can be done at the end of a search but
also, in part, prior to face-to-face interviews as a time saver – is
the only way to ensure you are hiring a track record and not an
interviewee.
Negotiation: At the end of the
process, both parties need to be happy with the result. Many a
search is restarted because of a negotiation gone sour. Be prepared
with two finalists, and make sure that no one is surprised when
numbers start being vocalized.
Getting Help:
The Benefits of a Search Firm
Search consultants, or headhunters, can be of enormous benefit to
nonprofits without the energy or time to handle a search internally. They
eliminate the need for an organization to dedicate 200 hours to a search,
but ask of them an average of one third of the successful hire's first
year's cash compensation in return. Some firms have minimum fees, and others
will perform a la carte search firm services (i.e., just reference checks)
on an hourly basis. "Willingness to pay," describes Lois L. Lindauer,
director of
Lois L. Lindauer
Searches, an executive search firm in Boston, "relates to perception of
value received. The hiring process is simple; it has concrete steps that are
readily understood. But simple doesn't translate into easy and the execution
is layered and difficult. Executive search firms earn their fees by being
expert in finding and qualifying candidates."
Fresh Eyes: From the beginning
of a search, an intuitive and insightful search consultant provides an
outside and unbiased view of your organization, adding critical depth and
perspective to your job description, while spinning your organization with a
fresh and exciting perspective for new applicants. Rebecca Worters leads
Capability
Company of Raleigh, North Carolina, and prides herself on "going the
extra mile to help nonprofits define positions in the context of their
missions, and working with key staff and board members to hone their
expectations of potential candidates." Doing so, she explains, sets up the
nonprofit for a successful hire by "bringing the organization into strategic
alignment, galvanizing energy and generally exciting board, staff and
funders about the organization's future."
An Expanded Candidate Pool:
After working with an organization to determine the direction of the
position and writing a job description, a search firm will advertise, call
and mail everyone they can and should about the search. A nonprofit using a
search firm should normally expect to be presented with a final pool of 6-8
qualified, interested candidates a couple of months into the process. These
candidates will come from advertising, their databases and from new
networking; by not using a search firm, you may cut your pool by one to two
thirds and you will most certainly cut its quality.
Larry
Slesinger, an executive recruiter and nonprofit management consulting
based in suburban Washington, DC, understands that it can be very hard for
busy senior staff to carve out the time required to do a thorough search.
"Search firms," Slesinger explains, "develop their candidate pools by
spending time every day on the search; and as a result, they can uncover
candidates that the organization itself may not find, especially if the
consultant has a network of sources (informants) who can identify promising
candidates and help spread the word."
A Specialization:
Headhunters who specialize in a specific function or geographic region
produce additional benefits for nonprofits as well. Susan Egmont was
recently hired to take on a search after an organization had advertised and
screened the first group of responses. "I was given a group of 70 resumes
when I started," Egmont explains, "and on first reading, I already knew 30
of the applicants." In addition to taking over much of the leg work of cold
calling and being able to advertise a position more effectively, "a good
search consultant," Egmont explains, "knows the market, many of the
candidates who are searching, and which have the most to offer." Using a
firm, especially one matching your geographic area or mission niche, helps
eliminate wasted time, money and effort.
Providing a Buffer:
Almost as important as going about getting interesting candidates is
how an organization deals with the disposal of the unqualified ones. In
addition to removing the job of sending hundreds of resume acknowledgement
letters from an overburdened nonprofit manager's task list, Larry Slesinger
places some of the value of search consultants in their ability to "be a
buffer between the organization and candidates that need to be handled
delicately, such as candidates recommended by board members, funders, and
other key people, or candidates who are friends of the key decision makers
but might not be right for the job." That buffer can also extend to the
negotiation process, where the headhunter can take much of the sting out of
an offer that doesn't meet expectations.
Deeper Knowledge
About Candidates: Good headhunters have interviewed hundreds if
not thousands of candidates and have gathered through experience or instinct
a sense of people that allows search committees to save enormous amounts of
time. Further, a headhunter will spend ten times as much time referencing a
candidate as they will interviewing one. Simply put, the person who shows up
for an interview isn't the same person who shows up for a job day in and day
out, and the time, expertise and experience of a headhunter will unearth the
track record you are about to hire. In addition, many headhunters check
credentials (degrees), credit histories and criminal records.
A Guarantee: In most cases,
the use of a search firm will result in a first-class hire. Even so, many
search firms will provide a one year guarantee if they are retained to
perform a full search. Lois Lindauer cautions that, "In the fluid business
and professional environment in which we operate, this guarantee can save
[nonprofits] twice as much in expensive management time." This guarantee
protects an organization if the new hire leaves for any reason during the
first year, and promises that the search firm will do the search again at no
additional cost to the organization, other than the recruiter's customary
reimbursable expenses such as travel, communications, supplies and the like.
FIVE
PEARLS OF WISDOM:
Determining Whether to Hire a Search
Firm or Keep the Process In-House
Doing a search
internally is difficult; hiring a search firm is expensive. Determine which
method is right for you by asking yourself these questions:
-
Does my organization have the capacity
and the resources to devote enough time and energy to a four month
search process, including processing application, making hundreds of
cold calls, and managing logistics and emotions of a complex and
dynamic search?
-
Can I find four to six interested and
qualified candidates through advertising and outreach? Have any
appropriate candidates already been identified by the board, staff
or other stakeholders?
-
Will my efforts, skills, and abilities
serve as a good marketing tool to the outside world about my
organization?
-
Will I be able to look objectively at
internal candidates as well as known potential candidates, to
discover talent I didn't realize existed, or bear the pressure of
rejecting a colleague?
-
Am I willing to ask tough, detailed
questions during reference checks, and do I understand the
intricacies of confidentiality?
|
Laura Gassner Otting is founder and president of
Nonprofit Professionals Advisory Group, a niche consulting firm dedicated to
strengthening the capacity of nonprofits and their staff,
and specializes in
helping nonprofit organizations nationwide with their hiring processes.
Increasing the
capacity of nonprofits and their staff.
|
|